Canlyniadau chwilio am the care act 2014

View our response to the NHS Assembly survey on the NHS@75

Case study: A biomedical scientist’s employer raised concerns following an incident where the registrant failed to follow procedure. When processing samples, the registrant failed to prevent contamination, which led to inaccurate results.

This report presents the key findings from a literature review: to explore the characteristics of effective clinical and peer supervision in the workplace.

The data for both these reports is from the snapshot date of 5 April in the preceding year (2022).

Our Year in Highlights show the HCPC’s work from the 1st of April 2019 through to the 31st of March 2020.

Exploring the public’s view on the principles that under-pin the Indicative Sanctions Policy, specifically focusing on general public views towards it

The Health Professions Council’s review of the grandparenting process. We have produced this document because it is important that as an organisation we assess how effectively we have achieved our aims. We have tried to do this is in a balanced way, including statistics and testimonials from some of those who were involved in, or affected by, the process.

Hear employers talking about their role in managing HCPC registrants. 

This report is the fourth in a series on research relating to the professions registered with the HCPC. It is part of our commitment to building the evidence base of regulation and being innovative in our approach. 

Case study: Dipak is a podiatrist who has recently started co-ordinating a campaign with his employer to promote the profession to the public